Chris Blouch wrote: > The next hurdle would be to edit a cell. If we are already using > arrows to navigate the grid how do we handle the overloading to > navigate within a cell? I suggest that once the user starts typing > alphanumeric characters they are now in "edit mode" or have chosen > to "interact with", in Apple Voice Over parlance, that particular > cell. Maybe there should be an extra key to interact but the > alphanumeric trigger could be sufficient. Once in edit mode the > arrows move through the cell content instead of the grid content. > Once editing is completed the user would need to get out of edit > mode. I would suggest Enter as a reasonable key that users might > try. One objection is that enter is often the submit function, but > this can be overridden and should be when in edit mode. This could > be a bit tricky if the grid cell content actually contains more > widgets so I would suggest that when the user is "interacting with" > a cell, tab and other general navigation become active but are > constrained to items within the cell until they stop interacting > with that cell. The idea of "interacting with" a sub-level ARIA widget solves a lot of complexity problems. In my opinion though, Enter and its counterpart, Escape, should be reserved for primary actions such as confirming or canceling forms and dialogs. What about: Shift + Down Arrow to "interact with" a sub-level item. Shift + Up Arrow to "stop interacting with" a sub-level item. Shift + Right Arrow to navigate to the next non-read-only item/cell in the list/grid. Shift + Left Arrow to navigate to the previous non-read-only item/ cell in the list/grid. Unlike the other modifier keys (control, alt, option, command, windows), shift if pretty consistent across browsers and platforms, and is rarely reserved by the browser. The only place I can see where this would cause trouble is with text selection using arrow keys, and ARIA widgets are already intercepting those arrow keys anyway.Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:35:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:32:07 GMT