Aaron M Leventhal wrote: > What policy should be used by this content > in terms of interrupting the user or other content being presented? It > seems universal. Maybe it's just me, but it feels more prescriptive of what a user agent should do compared to other attributes and their values. > The idea of "importance" was rejected because no author wants to > describe their content as "unimportant". It also doesn't really > describe how the interruptions should work. I wonder though which authors want to class their content as "rude". And again, not sure if the description of how it should work in a UA happens in other attributes/values, or at least in the same way/connotation. But then again, this might just be my personal interpretation. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 20:53:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:47 GMT