On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Well, HTML5 drops a feature of HTML4. *Somebody* decided to do so. HTML5 started from a clean slate. Nothing was dropped. However, the decision I was referring to was the decision of what to do with the recent feedback, which I assume introduced new information that I haven't yet dealt with. > IMHO, when revising something important as HTML, the right approach is > to leave things as they were, until you have a consensus for a change. > Unfortunately this is not the case with how HTML5 is developed right > now. Indeed, that isn't at all the approach HTML5 has taken. We started with a clean slate and had to justify everything we added. I disagree that this is a bad way of doing things, but to each his own. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 10:05:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:43 GMT