At 10:05 -0400 22/08/08, David Poehlman wrote: >not optional, missing. If it is missing it breaks spec but is still missing >so tools/authors need to fix it so that it is not missing. The {} for >instance was the hack to prevent missing. I am saying that it should be >real. But if missing is non-conformant, most sane tool authors will insert it to avoid a conformance failure. Then they insert alt="" (a lie) or alt="random text" (useless). Look, honestly, I don't want to sound harsh, and I value the dialogue, but until someone is actually willing to provide an alternative answer to the question -- not duck it, change it, or deny the problem exists -- we are just annoying each other. The spec. at least contains *an* answer, and it seems as if the discussion of role might converge on another. -- David Singer Apple/QuickTimeReceived on Friday, 22 August 2008 16:32:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:51:37 UTC