- From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:06:18 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Flickr is one of many public sites featuring user-generated content that > is mostly shared with friends and family, but which is mostly visible to > the general public. In terms of our moral sensibilities about > accessibility, it is more like a public bulletin board where anyone can > put up a poster, than like the professional signage in a store or school. I do not use Flickr, but I do use Picasaweb, which I believe is analogous. On Picasaweb, albums can be public or private. Would those who seek to differentiate between public and private facilities in terms of accessibility therefore accept that a /public/ album is /public/, and must therefore meet all legal accessibility requirements ? Philip TAYLOR
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 09:07:10 UTC