On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > > And in that regard: MathML has a required ALT attribute, for the > <mglyph> elmement. It would be strange if there would be no checking for > the @ALT on the HTML part of a document, while a full check on the MatML > part. The alt="" attribute on <mglyph> is quite different. The cases for which it makes sense (and improves accessibility) to omit alt="" on <img> don't apply to <mglyph>. The person using <mglyph> always knows what the glyph corresponds to. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 07:40:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:37 GMT