W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Process quibble Re: Joint meeting ... on ... aria issues

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:05:24 -0500
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, XHTML 2 WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, unagi69@concentric.net, Xtech <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-xtech-request@w3.org
Message-Id: <1192813524.6433.75.camel@pav>

On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 08:22 -0500, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
[...]
> > 
> Dan, I think this joint task force idea is a bad idea. We have
> adequate
> representation from each of the groups. We have been working on ARIA
> for
> a long time. I believe we have adequate people, as adults, working on
> how
> best to get aria across the different markups. What you are proposing
> could
> take months based on previous work in the W3C. People need access
> yesterday.

I don't have a strong feeling about a joint task force, but
could you clarify... which "we" has adequate representation
from each of the groups? Do you mean the WAI PF WG?


> My fault is not publishing int more to the open community. That is my
> fault. 
> 
> ... but lets' not put any unneeded process around this.
> 

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 19 October 2007 17:04:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:43 GMT