W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > July 2007

Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 03:22:22 +0100
Message-ID: <46ABF9DE.3010602@splintered.co.uk>
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
CC: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org

Lachlan Hunt wrote:

> Consider how difficult it is for a user to access the alternative 
> content nested within <object>.  AFAIK, the only way to do so in most 
> graphical browsers is to view the source.  So, if an audio file was 
> embedded using <object> (or <audio>) and the transcript was nested 
> within, that would make it difficult for users without assistive 
> technology to access it.

But, unless I'm mistaken, no current UA even renders HTML5's <audio> and 
<video>, so comparing how they currently handle HTML4's <object> may not 
be all that relevant. And if the spec stated that UAs need to handle 
fallback content a certain way (possibly making reference to UAAG 1.0 in 
passing as well) that gives users control, would that be a likely step 
in the right direction? Or is the historically flaky implementation of 
<object> going to kill this idea off right from the get-go?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2007 02:22:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:43 GMT