W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > December 2007

Re: activedescendant vs activedescendent

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:41:01 +0000
Message-ID: <475CA73D.8000302@splintered.co.uk>
To: wai-xtech@w3.org

Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:

> ALL early adapters of ARIA would have to comprehensively review 
> their application's code to ensure that their syntax conforms with 
> the "new" syntax

However, if this were to be done, the earlier it happens the better.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 02:41:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:44 GMT