W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Update ARIA Examples: Live Regions and Tab Panel

From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:35:27 +0100
Message-ID: <e2a28a920708311335w7e65c694g9c0fc1340bec4e56@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Aaron M Leventhal" <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@uiuc.edu>, "W3C WAI-PFWG" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf-request@w3.org, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>

Thanks, Aaron. I vaguely remember reading something from Henri Sivonen
about Firefox changing its accept header to prefer text/html, but
wanted to clarify that Firefox is still okay with
application/xhtml+xml when using XHTML 1.1. As the specification
states that XHTML 1.1 should not be served as text/html, I prefer not
to use text/html (I have this thing about rules that probably isn't
healthy).

Have a great weekend.

Thanks,

Gez


On 31/08/2007, Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes it's fine to serve XHTML to Firefox.
>
> By "prefers" I meant something different -- that there was a technical change in how it interprets the http-accept header. If the page can be served either way Firefox will actually ask for HTML. Apparently the incremental rendering works better then, or something like that.
>
> The community does probably prefer HTML over XHTML as well. But, there is nothing to stop anyone from using XHTML mime type.
>
> - Aaron
>
> Aaron Leventhal
>  IBM web accessibility architect
>  Voice: 781-583-4083
>  Tie line: 364-5945
>  http://www.mozilla.org/access
>
>
>
>
>  "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
>
> 08/31/2007 04:18 PM
>
>
> To Aaron M Leventhal/Cambridge/IBM@IBMUS
>
> cc "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@uiuc.edu>, "W3C WAI-PFWG" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf-request@w3.org, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
>
> Subject Re: Update ARIA Examples: Live Regions and Tab Panel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, Aaron. In that document it states that Firefox prefers HTML to
>  XHTML - if I have a doctype of XHTML 1.1, it should be served as
>  application/xhtml+xml. Is it still okay to serve that to Firefox?
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Gez
>
>
>
>  On 31/08/2007, Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > Yes, see this section in our docs:
>  > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/ARIA:_Accessible_Rich_Internet_Applications#Choosing_XHTML_or_HTML
>  >
>  > - Aaron
>  >
>  >
>  > Aaron Leventhal
>  >  IBM web accessibility architect
>  >  Voice: 781-583-4083
>  >  Tie line: 364-5945
>  >  http://www.mozilla.org/access
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
>  >
>  > 08/31/2007 03:58 PM
>  >
>  > To Aaron M Leventhal/Cambridge/IBM@IBMUS
>  >
>  > cc "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@uiuc.edu>, "W3C WAI-PFWG" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf-request@w3.org, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
>  >
>  > Subject Re: Update ARIA Examples: Live Regions and Tab Panel
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Hi Aaron,
>  >
>  >  On 31/08/2007, Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>  >  > They actually don't have to be if you serialize the ARIA attributes
>  >  > with setAttributeNS(). It's a second reasonable option, instead of
>  >  > mime type switching.
>  >
>  >  That's useful to know; thank you - I didn't realise that was an option.
>  >
>  >  Best regards,
>  >
>  >  Gez
>  >
>  >  --
>  >  _____________________________
>  >  Supplement your vitamins
>  >  http://juicystudio.com
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>  _____________________________
>  Supplement your vitamins
>  http://juicystudio.com
>
>



-- 
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 20:35:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:43 GMT