W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > December 2004

Re: Maybe Why Speech Synthesisers Are So Difficult To Get Used To

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:38:16 -0800
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20041229062830.01f2d7e8@pop3.gorge.net>
To: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, "Will Pearson" <will-pearson@tiscali.co.uk>,<uvip@yahoogroups.com>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>

At 10:57 AM 12/28/2004, Al Gilman wrote:
>The speech is unnatural, but not under-performing

The old guy chimes in with anecdotal info:

After a comparatively brief learn-ramp, many (most/all?) of my blind pals 
much prefer synthesized speech for accessing information from a computer. 
They'd maybe rather hear a professional actor reading books of a certain 
persuasion to them but that's so much too slow for acquiring information 
other than the art of the prose/poetry situation that it's not even close. 
"Expression" just gets in the way at 600 wpm.

As to all the phonemicity interchanges: it's more like talking about the 
difference between "country" and "western" than about the difference 'twixt 
country/western and rock/roll. And of course the "jazz truth" transcends 
all that!

I'd rather hear from Janina about this than from me, but I couldn't stay out.

--
Love.

Everyone/everything/everywhere/always connected 


-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.4 - Release Date: 12/22/2004
Received on Wednesday, 29 December 2004 14:38:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:39 GMT