- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 28 Mar 2002 13:48:06 +0100
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org
le jeu 28-03-2002 à 13:21, Steven Pemberton a écrit : > > > Visually I feel the table needs to be indented a little > > Do you mean there should be more space on the left? > > Yes. > > > > I think "re-sorted" should just be "sorted" > > The re-sorted title has been suggested as being clearer for accessible > reasons. > > I would like to have *that* explained to me! At the point we are at in the > hierarchy, we aren't looking at anything sorted. If we were in a sorted > list, then re-sorted would be fine, but we aren't yet. I don't have any good argument for this. Once again, this was proposed by other people than me. > > > Move the "by" into the header, so it reads "sorted by", and then the > columns > > > are just thread, author, and subject. > > Same as above. > > I can believe that one a bit more, though I doubt accessibility is really > improved at this micro-level. It really is: most people using aural browsers go from link to link (vs reading the full web page) and a link saying "by thread" is a little more informative than "thread". > > I hadn't noticed the empty row, and I like your suggestion of 2 tbody. > > Regarding visual appearance, I hope this can be handled through CSS. > > I had hoped that too. But I couldn't get it to work. That was what I meant > with my comment: > > > Hmm neither Opera nor > > Netscape 6 seem to do margins or borders on <tbody>. That still needs > work. I see, I hadn't understood it that way. Hmm... I don't see that as a too big problem though. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C's Webmaster mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 07:48:09 UTC