W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > May 2001

RE: WAI Glossary New URL

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 22:37:03 -0400
To: "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>
Cc: "3WC WAI X-TECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Message-ID: <LPBBLABFJBGNHPLEJINNGEPBCHAA.ryladog@earthlink.net>
Good point, William..............I'll fix that.  The talk in Boston seemed
to center around some kind of permanent dating system, if it is to be
normative.  I am all for having this be dated as we go along, what do you
all think we should do at this point?..................Katie

You are never asleep at the wheel are you William?  Take

-----Original Message-----
From: William Loughborough [mailto:love26@gorge.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 10:32 PM
To: ryladog@earthlink.net; 3WC WAI X-TECH
Cc: Charles McCathieNevile; Wendy Chisholm
Subject: Re: WAI Glossary New URL

At 09:54 PM 5/5/01 -0400, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote:

I don't know if this has already been worried to death but...

If the glossary has "acronym" in it (which includes "abbreviation" in its
definition), it should have "abbreviation" in it - particularly since it's
the basis for a tag of some sort?

If this is the latest working draft, why is it dated 10 February?

Received on Saturday, 5 May 2001 22:39:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:51:26 UTC