It isn't a problem to have them mixed in, since we anticipate extracting glossary entries rather than directly referring to the glossary. But they do need to be marked up as abbreviations. I think it is better in a spec to list abbreviations seperately. Thoughts? Charles On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote: At the moment we have API, DOM, ASCII, CTM, DTD, ................ These are currently mixed in, should we also have an Abbreviations only area? So add............SVG, ULR/URI, WCAG, UAAG, PDF ? Katie Haritos-Shea 508 Coordinator / Webmaster CIW NTIS - US Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 USA 703-605-6426 FAX:703-605-6734 kshea@fedworld.gov kshea@ntis.gov -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 13:06:08 UTC