Re: [wbs] response to 'Scripts for Evaluation Intro Videos (Updated)'

Hi Kevin,

Great to have you back!

Many thanks for your comments. I addressed most of them in the latest 
update. Some issues are on the agenda for discussion. Below are some 
responses to specific comments:


On 12/09/2019 16:42, Kevin White via WBS Mailer wrote:
[SNIP]
>> ---------------------------------
>> Video 1: Evaluation Overview
[SNIP]
> 3: Would be good to mention something of the iterative aspect of the
> approach.

Tried to add the word "iteratively" or "repeatedly" but they seem too 
clunky: "Ideally you evaluate [iteratively/repeatedly] throughout the 
design and development process". Do you have other suggestions?


[SNIP]
> Related to this on the visuals, I am not sure that Lego or Tetris
> conveys that iterative nature of integration.
> 7 - 12: Visuals have a lot of screen moving and zooming - couple of things;
> firstly, the moving could have the same distracting effect similar to
> parallax scrolling for some users, secondly, I am not sure how engaging
> this would look - can't think of an alternative for the latter and it is a
> niggle rather than a major concern.
> 14: Positive visual would be good, are there potential issues with a
> check-mark visual? Mild concern related to avoiding checklists

Visuals are on the agenda for discussion.


[SNIP]
>> ---------------------------------
>> Video 2: Preliminary Evaluation
[SNIP]
> 2: Visuals: This might be a bit fastidious but I wonder if using a
> completely fictitious bug scattering might give the wrong impression of how
> the tools would work? I know it is not possible to use any particular tool
> but wonder if it would possible to use a visual that is more similar to the
> patterns used in the tools?

What do you mean by "patterns used in the tools"?


[SNIP]
>> ---------------------------------
>> Video 3: Selecting and Using Tools
[SNIP]
> 3: Is this a significant point? It seems a truism.

Good point. Yet this is probably the most frequent question so thought 
it should be addressed. Adding it for discussion too.


[SNIP]
>> ---------------------------------
>> Video 4: Comprehensive Evaluation
[SNIP]
> 9: Text: Might be something that is being worked on but does WCAG-EM report
> tool support 2.1?

Yes, being worked on.

Thanks,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Friday, 13 September 2019 04:06:25 UTC