Re: [wbs] response to 'WAI-Curricula: Thorough Review for units 1 and 2'

Hello Sylvie:


Welcome back! I hope you have had a great holiday.


As per the missing surveys, I have reopened unit 4 survey 
<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/standards-and-guidelines-draft-review/>for 
you. Please follow the live draft 
<https://deploy-preview-72--wai-curricula.netlify.com/curricula/1-4/>link 
that is on the survey instead of the frozen one, which is heavily 
outdated. I expect to merge soon but at this time I didn't do that yet. 
I have opened the survey until Friday 6th, tell me if this is not enough.


Also as a follow-up for units 1 and 2 thorough review you said:



On 8/2/2019 2:30 PM, Sylvie Duchateau via WBS Mailer wrote:
>
> Comments:
> This sounds clear also.
> Homework means that the course is more than one day. See for example
> following task: "Ask students to contact a person with a disability and
> interview them about what access barriers they encounter when trying to
> access digital content or applications. Students will write up a summary of
> the interview and share with other students in class."
> This means that students will meet again with the teacher after this task.
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------


As I see this activity, it is true that it might take more than one day 
for students to complete it and handle it to the instructor. I don't see 
this as a bad thing for some of the courses built from these curricula. 
I think we should point to this type of activity on the curricula and 
let course creators decide if they want to include it or not given their 
particular context. Some instructors may need to adapt this activity 
since they might not see students after the lesson, but others might not 
have that constrain.


Do you feel strongly about this activity not being convenient?


Best.


Daniel.




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus