Re: [wbs] response to 'Approval of Scripts for Evaluation Videos'

I don’t feel like investing more time into the discussion. Testing 
process is very general. CI and deployment are also not a 
“buzzwords” but proper specialized terminology, as much as CMS is.

The suggested wording is good enough for me.

On 10 Oct 2019, at 15:25, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:

> You initially suggested "deploy process", which I expanded to "testing 
> process". You are not speaking of "continuous integration (CI)", which 
> is another buzzword (besides "continuous deployment (CD)", "continuous 
> testing (CT)", etc.). I add this to the agenda to get further input.
>
> Many thanks,
>   Shadi
>
>
> On 10/10/2019 15:17, Eric Eggert wrote:
>> It works but it does not address my specific comment, which, at this 
>> point, I don’t want to further pursue. If we don’t want to 
>> mention CI, which would help many development teams, then this OK for 
>> me.
>>
>> 👋 Eric
>>
>>>
>>> On 10. Oct 2019, at 14:52, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I changed the sequence now to:
>>>
>>> "Tools can be integrated into different work environments. For 
>>> example, into your web browser, content management system (C-M-S), 
>>> code editor, or your testing process."
>>>
>>> Hope this works now?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>   Shadi
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/10/2019 09:56, Hidde de Vries wrote:
>>>>>> On 8 Oct 2019, at 09:10, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org 
>>>>>> <mailto:ee@w3.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Project managers should know what a deploy process & continuous 
>>>>> testing is, they have to plan for both.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think there is a way to make that more understandable for 
>>>>> “non-techies” as we can’t make JavaScript, code editor, 
>>>>> content management system or web browser more understandable for 
>>>>> “non-techies”. For “non-techies”, all of those words are 
>>>>> jargon. And that‘s ok imho because we said ”work 
>>>>> environments” first.
>>>> Yep, I believe deploy process and continuous testing (or 
>>>> “continuous deployment”) should be understandable for most 
>>>> project managers. Agreed it is a bit jargonny, but in the same 
>>>> sense as “content management system” and “web browser”.
>>>> Fwiw, I've also heard the term a lot from project managers whom (I 
>>>> suspected) did not necessarily know what it means (so I think the 
>>>> group of people who know that it exists is larger than the group of 
>>>> people who know what it is).
>>>> Examples of the terminology used in the wild:
>>>> - Atlassian, makers of project management tooling, don't shy away 
>>>> from the terminology on their homepage 
>>>> <https://www.atlassian.com/>, and product pages 
>>>> <https://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo>
>>>> - Gitlab, another project (or more like: source code) management 
>>>> solution <https://gitlab.com> even use the abbreviation “CI” as 
>>>> one of the first things on their homepage
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
>>> Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
>>> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>>
>
> -- 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
> Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)



--

Eric Eggert
Web Accessibility Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Thursday, 10 October 2019 13:29:56 UTC