- From: Daniel Montalvo Charameli <dmontalvo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:52:28 +0200
- To: estella.oncins@uab.cat, shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hey Estella: Thanks for your feedback. As per the order of topics, we have been making changes in the live draft at https://deploy-preview-72--wai-curricula.netlify.com/curricula/1-4/ I have also opened an issue https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/issues/89 to further discuss this if necessary. The first topic explains the principles and talks about examples of such principles, not requirements or success criteria, which are introduced later on in the unit. Is it now clearer for you? Best. On 8/23/2019 12:30 PM, Estella Oncins via WBS Mailer wrote: > The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'WAI-Curricula: > Draft Review for unit 4 "Standards and guidelines"' (Education and Outreach > Working Group) for Estella Oncins. > >> --------------------------------- >> Overview >> >> ---- >> This survey is for a first review of Unit 4: Standards and Guidelines >> teaching unit, as part of the Introduction to Web Accessibility" teaching >> module. >> >> Background: WAI Curricula Requirements Analysis >> >> Focus for your review: >> * Are all topics covered well? Is anything missing? Is anything in there >> that shouldn't be? >> * Try to note any significant issues at this point, so we can address >> them now. >> * Comments on details, including wording, are welcome at this point. >> Feel free to comment in the below edit boxes or to open a New GitHub >> Issue >> >> Note: The review versions linked above will not change during the review >> period. The editor will address some issues as they come in, so the live >> draft might change during this review period. You might want to check >> GitHub issues and the live updates before doing your review: Live draft - >> Unit 4 - Standards and Guidelines >> > Comments: > > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Review level and timing >> >> ---- >> Please indicate below the level of consideration you were able to provide >> for this review. If you were unable to get to it and would like more >> time, please indicate that as well. Thanks! >> >> > * (x) I read the material carefully > . > * ( ) I skimmed the material > > * ( ) I need more time and have put a date below when I can get to it. > * ( ) I am not going to be able to review this material and will defer to > the decisions of the group. > > Excellent work! > The links provided in the draft do not work. > Comments: > - I don't know in how far it would be relevant to also include the "Web > Accessibility Laws & Policies" (https://www.w3.org/WAI/policies/) at least > as a "Teaching Resource", in order to relate "Standards and Guidelines" > with "Laws and Policies" > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Unit 4: Standards and Guidelines >> >> ---- >> Focus on unit 4 Standards and Guidelines: >> * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and >> competences? >> * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are coherent >> and feasible? >> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >> * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments? >> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >> GitHub Issue for Unit 4 >> > Comments: > > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Topic: Principles of Accessible Design >> >> ---- >> Focus on topic Principles of Accessible Design: >> * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes? >> * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas >> are aligned? >> * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the scope >> of this topic? >> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >> * Do you have further ideas or suggestions? >> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >> GitHub Issue for Topic Principles of Accessible Design >> > Comments: > Excellent work! I am not sure if it would be better to first introduce the > topic "Standards and Guidelines" and then the topic "Principles of > Accessible Design" > > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Topic: Standards and Guidelines >> >> ---- >> Focus on topic Standards and Guidelines: >> * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes? >> * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas >> are aligned? >> * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the scope >> of this topic? >> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >> * Do you have further ideas or suggestions? >> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >> GitHub Issue for Topic Standards and Guidelines >> >> > Comments: > Excellent work! But I think that the content is very dense in this specific > topic. > I would maybe enlarge the Learning Outcomes section which to me is a bit > narrow according to the Ideas for Assessment. > Maybe it can be useful to introduce concepts such as: Web Content > Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines > (ATAG), User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (UAAG) and Accessible Rich > Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) already in the Learning Outcomes. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Topic: First Checks for Web Accessibility >> >> ---- >> Focus on topic First Checks for Web Accessibility: >> * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes? >> * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas >> are aligned? >> * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the scope >> of this topic? >> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >> * Do you have further ideas or suggestions? >> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >> GitHub Issue for Topic First Checks for Web Accessibility >> >> > Comments: > Excellent work! Maybe in the Ideas for Assessment it is missing to > establish a relation between the principles and the web content, authoring > tools, and user agents. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Any other Thoughts/suggestions? >> >> ---- >> Any other thoughts or suggestions? >> >> > Comments: > > >> These answers were last modified on 23 August 2019 at 10:27:16 U.T.C. >> by Estella Oncins >> > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/standards-and-guidelines-draft-review/ > until 2019-08-28. > > Regards, > > The Automatic WBS Mailer > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2019 16:52:33 UTC