Re: Policy page open issues

Hi Mary Jo,

I am posting to WAI editors so that I have public link to update the
minutes when I finish the cleanup.  Thanks for this!

Best,
Sharron

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I have some questions/comments regarding the meeting minutes as well as
> open issues that didn't get covered in today's EOWG meeting:
>
>    - There are a few countries with dummy data (Italy, Portugal, Spain,
>    Switzerland). I'm working on more updates today starting with Switzerland.
>    Though I've asked others in my department for help, no one has done
>    anything, so the going is slow for me...using google translate, trying to
>    pick through the few good links on the existing policy page to get clues on
>    where the rest might be. :/ Eric or Shawn, let me know what day you plan to
>    move over the content to be live and I can rip out those files prior to you
>    moving them.
>
>
>    - Judy also sent me a note that she felt China and U.S. weren't fully
>    up-to-date but gave no details or pointers so I've sent her a note to ask
>    what she feels is incorrect or missing.
>
>
>    - *Issue 35* <https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues/35>:
>    We still need language markup for names of standards in the standards.yaml
>    file. See France's standard in there - in French.
>
>
>    - Three issues that haven't been put into a milestone:
>       - *Issue 176*
>          <https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues/176>: This
>          is a new issue for the U.S. but the link provided has old information on it
>          (says 508 is a draft). I found a more recent page of information, added and
>          closed it.
>          - *Issue 199*
>          <https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues/199>:
>          Feedback box - from Shawn. This hasn't been put into a milestone. Not much
>          was minuted in the call when discussing the topic, so I can't follow what
>          was decided. I'm thinking it isn't completely necessary since the
>          submission form already has a open format entry field. What was your take
>          after today's call? If nothing concretely decided, I'd say we can move that
>          one to the post-launch bucket. Agree?
>          - *Issue 190*
>          <https://github.com/w3c/wai-policies-prototype/issues/190>: Was
>          it decided to make the addition of the sentence? It seems that there were
>          mixed feedback on that and it was only Shawn that felt strongly about it.
>          Is that required for the policy launch? I think it can be postponed, if
>          done at all unless you all decided to add it.
>          - Questions about informal usability testing at AccessU:
>       - Do we simply ask them to do a few tasks, e.g.:
>             - Look for the laws and policies information for a particular
>             country
>             - Find a particular law or policy
>             - Find out which countries/policies use WCAG 2.0
>             - Submit an update (to see if they can find the button)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mary Jo
> ------------------------------
> <http://www.ibm.com/able>
> *Mary Jo Mueller*
> Accessibility Standards Program Manager
> IBM Accessibility, IBM Research, Austin, TX
> Phone: 512-286-9698 <(512)%20286-9698> | Tie-line: 363-9698
> *Search for accessibility answers* <http://ibm.biz/a11y-search>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/e/vgh/2419815/eml-grp-sub/>
> <http://www.facebook.com/IBMAccessibility> <http://twitter.com/IBMAccess>
> "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and
> become more, you are a leader."
> *~John Quincy Adams*
>
>


-- 
Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility
*Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*