- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:31:09 -0600
- To: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
- CC: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
[10:16] * yatil notes that he has updated the table tutorials with the wording of the tables cover page… Better! - except the first one seems to have been missed (and I think that's the most important one to clarify the image :). Also, I think tweaking the others as below would help significantly by decreasing the focus on the table categories: * "<h>Tables with two headers</h> Tables with two headers have a simple row header and a simple column header." -> <h>Tables with two headers</h> This page covers tables that have a simple row header and a simple column header. * "<h>Tables with irregular headers</h> Tables with irregular headers have header cells that span multiple columns and/or rows." -> <h>Tables with irregular headers</h> This page covers tables with header cells that span multiple columns and/or rows. * "<h>Tables with multi-level headers</h> Tables with multi-level headers have multiple header cells associated per data cell." -> <h>Tables with multi-level headers</h> This page covers tables that have multi-level header cells associated per data cell. Based on above, the first one would be: <h>Tables with one header</h> This page covers tables that have with one header for rows <strong>or</strong> for columns. or even more clear: <h>Tables with one header</h> This page covers tables that have with one header for rows <strong>or</strong> one header for columns. or to better differentiate it from the irregular and multi-level: <h>Tables with one header</h> This page covers tables that have one simple header for rows <strong>or</strong> one simple header for columns. (I prefer the 2nd or 3rd option!) ~Shawn
Received on Friday, 27 February 2015 20:31:18 UTC