Absolute terms [was: Re: Presentation of examples in Quick Start Tips]

Hi All,

Separating out this point as I think it can be resolved without conflating it with the overall design issues.

> On 19 Aug 2015, at 08:57, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> * Avoid "Accessible" and "Inaccessible" valuation as this sounds too absolute, and we all know there is no absolute accessibility;

> On 19 Aug 2015, at 09:59, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> While correct/incorrect is probably the correct(!sic) way to do it, the wording feels a little bit bureaucratic and not very welcoming. I tried using “Do” and “Don’t” instead in this mockup and it works well (at least for the color example):
> 

I think correct/incorrect and do/don’t are as absolute as accessible/inaccessible. I would propose using poor/good as more subjective and friendly terms. As you say Shadi, there are no absolutes but it is generally quite easy to identify poor approaches and good approaches.

Thanks

Kevin