W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > February 2009

[Fwd: Updated: Pending issues for Mobile Web Accessibility document]

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:05:44 -0600
Message-ID: <49A871C8.1010702@w3.org>
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
CC: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Hi Shadi,

We found this in open action items:
"
Shadi to summarize different perspectives of WCAG and MWBP
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/15-eo-minutes.html#action05]
"
in regards to this document: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/latest

Please let us know if you have already completed this, or if you will not be able to get to it in the next couple of weeks and are OK with us closing it out, or if you want more time to complete it.

Thanks,
~Shawn


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Updated: Pending issues for Mobile Web Accessibility document
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:23:41 -0600
From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
To: EOWG (E-mail) <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

EOWG,

Below is Alan's list of pending edits resorted and numbered to facilitate discussion in today's teleconference.

Note that the latest version of the document is at <http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/latest>

1. Consider add link to the contents (like on other pages...)
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action07]

2. Single HTML page (13/06/2008 WAI EOWG, 
[http://www.w3.org/2008/06/13-eo-minutes.html#action08)

3. Acronyms in H1 (13/06/2008 WAI EOWG, 
[http://www.w3.org/2008/06/13-eo-minutes.html#action01)

4. Top Menu: In the top menu, again MWBP does not have a version, would it be better to have the version number for consistency and for the future developments? Comment: further discussion needed. No new version of MWBP is expected (WG has now moved on to MWABP)

5. Think about using an icon to highlight BPs that do give compliance with WCAG.
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Feb

6. Why No WCAG to MWBP Mapping Table?: It would be good to give an example why the relationships are not symmetrical. Otherwise it is not clear.

7. Explain difference in approach between MWBPs and WCAG, testability, best practices v. success criteria.

8. Alan to consider rephrase of "compliance" section
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/15-eo-minutes.html#action04]

9. Include audience section but not for next draft. Was last included in 
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwbp-wcag-20080606/. 
Comment: This had previously been rejected by EOWG.

10. Alan/Shawn consider subnav on Overview page
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action06]

11. Shawn & Alan - look at how to put preference on WCAG 2.0 in both the overview and also in the subpages.
[recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action01]

12. Shawn proposes moving some of the info from the technical overview page to the WAI intro page. and look at edits based on points from EOWG discussion...
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action04]

13. Shadi to summarize different perspectives of WCAG and MWBP
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/15-eo-minutes.html#action05]

###
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 23:05:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:13:17 GMT