W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > December 2009

RE: quick reply pls -- New WAI website category for "user" documents?

From: <saylordj@wellsfargo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:47:08 -0600
To: <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DC44CF1AAC5F3E4C8D87CDA1C47D84D24CACF6B93D@MSGCMSV21012.ent.wfb.bank.corp>
Morning Shawn, and EOWG folks,
Instead of User Perspective I would title the list "Where to look for Web Access Help"

I think a top level navigation on the WAI home page is merited.

I agree with Alan that the documents titles are not as good as plain sentences about what the visitor seeks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:11 PM
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra; Judy Brewer; Andrew Arch; Helle BjarnÝ; Alan Chuter; Sylvie Duchateau; William Loughborough; Liam McGee; Sharron Rush; Saylor, Doyle J.; Jennifer Sutton; Welsh, Jack R; Yeliz Yesilada
Subject: quick reply pls -- New WAI website category for "user" documents?
Importance: High

Yeliz, Jack, Jennifer, Doyle, Sharron, Liam, Sylvie, Alan, Helle, Andrew, Shadi, Judy,

We have several new documents recently published and upcoming over the next few months that are for "users", including people with disabilities and older users with age-related impairments.

We are considering adding a top level navigation category to the WAI website information architecture. A draft of one idea is at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/users/

Please reply with some quick thoughts now. We might make an initial decision on *Wednesday 16 December*.

If you have time, please also send thoughts on:
* do we want to add a top level navigation category or not?
* if no, where should the new documents go in the current information architecture?
* if yes, which documents should go in the new category?
* if yes, what should it be called? if you were an "average" "user", what would words in the navigation would lead you to select them thinking that there was material there for you?

NOTE: Please reply to wai-eo-editors@w3.org as appropriate.

Thanks for any input!

Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 15:48:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:25:21 UTC