W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Editorial comments on "Shared Web Experiences: Barriers Common to Mobile Device Users and People with Disabilities"

From: Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:00:46 +0100
Message-Id: <FEFBE152-5A71-4AB1-A870-DEA9E68AE95C@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org, public-bpwg <public-bpwg@w3.org>
To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>

Hi Jo,

Thanks a lot for your comments, I will address them in the next version.

Regards,
Yeliz.
On 10 Sep 2008, at 10:09, Jo Rabin wrote:

> Hi Yeliz
>
> I apologise for not having got my comments to you earlier. I'd  
> prepared them but somehow managed not to send them.
>
> Jo
>
> In general I like the layout.
>
> I think that it might be worth making the descriptive text that  
> follows the title more consistent. Sometimes it says "the user"  
> sometimes "user" sometimes "user" is implied and sometimes it is a  
> staccato list of problems e.g. "Information loss. Content inoperable"
>
> Would it be better if "Large page or large images" read "Large  
> pages and large images"?
>
> In the same section Users / get or User / gets ?
>
> In the section "Information conveyed only using CSS" is it worth  
> mentioning that CSS can contain content as well as formatting -  
> e.g. background image and "before" and "after" text?
>
> On "Missing or inappropriate page title" - - the title is often not  
> displayed at all in mobile browsers. So the significance is  
> probably that bookmark lists don't make much sense.
>
> Under Focus (tab) order - I think the mobile section sort of  
> implies that navigation is via tab key, which it isn't, but in any  
> case it may be worth mentioning that it's hard to navigate with the  
> common 4-way rocker.
>
> At Long words etc. - I think it may be worth mentioning that the  
> users context often means that they want rapid access to  
> unambiguous information - i.e. it's not just that they are  
> distracted and have partial attention on the content.
>
> Invalid or unsupported markup - some older devices don't display  
> invalid markup at all. I don't think that content adaptation is the  
> main point here, and should probably be removed.
>
>
>
> On 10/09/2008 08:27, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>> Le mercredi 10 septembre 2008 à 07:17 +0100, Yeliz Yesilada a écrit :
>>> I just wanted to let you know that I have addressed all your  
>>> comments  in the new version <http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/ 
>>> experiences-new>. If  you still think something needs further  
>>> changes or if I haven't  addressed any of your comments fully,  
>>> please let me know.
>> Thanks, it looks good.
>> Dom
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2008 10:01:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:13:17 GMT