W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Shared Web Experiences - review comments

From: <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:15:15 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <1951.75.134.19.95.1220991315.squirrel@webmail.w3.org>
To: "Yeliz Yesilada" <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org

Hi Yeliz,

Here are two followups. The rest are OK as is.

1. You have suggested that "SLH: I think these sentences need context
and suggest adding the heading that is in the table version:
"Experience:"]] ".
YY - I think it is very clear that we are talking about common
experiences. If I add "Experiences" to all of them, then I think it
will be very repetitive :(

SLH2: Now that you have reworded them and most start with "User" it is
easier to tell that they are experiences, and I agree not to add it.
Consider further rewording to make them more similar, perhaps all starting
with "User". For example:
* Cant operate or interact correctly with content, misses prompts, makes
mistakes. >
User cant operate or interact correctly with content, misses prompts,
makes mistakes.
* Missing, or inappropriate, or long page title means user cannot scan
easily get an overview. > Users cannot easily scan to get an overview
because of missing, inappropriate, or long page title.
(and others)

2. SLH: error in the code above - before SCROLLING is </li><>li>]].
YY - Unfortunately, I cannot find this error.

SLH2: I'm seeing this:
<li>MWBP 1.0 Best Practice: <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#PAGE_SIZE_USABLE">PAGE_SIZE_USABLE</a>
and</li><li> <a
  href="http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#SCROLLING">SCROLLING</a>.</li>

Which should be:
<li>MWBP 1.0 Best Practice: <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#PAGE_SIZE_USABLE">PAGE_SIZE_USABLE</a>
and <a
  href="http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#SCROLLING">SCROLLING</a>.</li>

Thanks!

Best,
~Shawn


> Hi Shawn,
>
> I have addressed most of your comments, except the following. Please
> see my comments below:
>
> - You have suggested that "SLH: I think these sentences need context
> and suggest adding the heading that is in the table version:
> "Experience:"]] ".
> YY - I think it is very clear that we are talking about common
> experiences. If I add "Experiences" to all of them, then I think it
> will be very repetitive :(
>
> - You have suggested "SLH: what about breaking up "large page" and
> "large images" in to two different items?]]".
> YY- I think the problem that we are talking about is much broader
> than that, breaking up large page into two different items, I think
> is just a specific example.
>
> - SLH: error in the code above - before SCROLLING is </li><>li>]].
> YY - Unfortunately, I cannot find this error.
>
> - SLH: I'm missing why this is a significant issue for people who are
> color blind, given that color contrast and redundant coding is
> covered elsewhere.]]
> YY- I agree with you that there are some repetition in the
> experiences discussed, but I think that's not a problem because
> people will most probably not read the whole document in one go - at
> least I hope :) but if you think this would be a problem, I can go
> through and check the repetition.
>
> - SLH: Is it a significant issue for mobile device users when lon
> sentences are broken across multiple lines? or really long words
> break in odd places?]]
> YY- I am not sure about this. Is this really an important issue?
>
> Regards,
> Yeliz.
> On 13 Aug 2008, at 22:34, Shawn Henry wrote:
>
>> EOWG and Yeliz,
>>
>> I've just finished another thorough read-through of the "Shared Web
>> Experiences: Barriers Common to Mobile Device Users and People with
>> Disabilities" document at <http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences-
>> new-format>
>>
>> It's looking very good!
>>
>> I have noted a few suggestions for additions and requests for
>> clarification -- for editor consideration and EOWG discussion where
>> needed -- in a draft at <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/MWBP-WCAG/
>> experiences-SLH.html>
>>
>> Reminder: The Shared Web Experiences document is the main topic on
>> the agenda for this week, 15 August, and this week may be the last
>> EOWG discussion of it before the completed version is published.
>>
>> Regards,
>> ~Shawn
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 20:15:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:13:17 GMT