Here are the answers submitted to 'EOWG Call for Review: Using Combined Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Barry McMullin. --------------------------------- Using Combined Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility ---- * ( ) I accept this version of the document as is * (x) I accept this version of the document, and suggest changes below * ( ) I accept this version of the document only with the changes below * ( ) I do not accept this version of the document because of the comments below * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Comments ---- Comments on the document, formatted as described above. Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): * priority: editor's discretion * location: Considerations in Combining Expertise : Involving users in evaluation : para 2, sentence 1. * current wording: "Regardless of the collective expertise of a collaborative group of evaluators in conducting conformance evaluations, an organization may ..." * suggested revision: "Regardless of the collective expertise of a collaborative group of evaluators in conducting accessibility evaluations, an organization may ..." * rationale: "conformance evaluation" has a specialised, technical connotation that is probably not necessary or intended here? These answers were last modified on 15 March 2006 at 10:57:47 U.T.C. by Barry McMullin Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/expertise-2006/ until 2006-03-18. Regards, The Automatic WBS MailerReceived on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 11:02:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 June 2007 18:09:42 GMT