W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > October 2004

WCAG Overview etc

From: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:34:33 +1000
To: <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Cc: "Shawn Lawton Henry \(E-mail\)" <shawn@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008201c4b2c4$175e80e0$6601a8c0@yourdh7axfhyur>

Hi Shawn,

All pretty damm good now. Well done :-)

Just a comment/question re clarity of reading. In the RHS the links and the
non-linked text has the same visual appearance - potentially breaking
Checkpoint 2.1.

I don't have an immediate suggestion, other than underlining the links which
may look ugly. What about a different shade of rust or blue for linked and
non-linked words?


Dr Andrew Arch
Manager Online Accessibility Consulting
Accessible Information Solutions, NILS
Ph 613 9864 9222; Fax 613 9864 9210; Mobile 0438 755 565
http://www.nils.org.au/ | http://www.it-test.com.au/ |

Member, Education & Outreach Working Group,
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative

National Information & Library Service, Australia
A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 14:36:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:25:17 UTC