RE: tech factors - copyedits and refs

Andrew & Henk,

Most updates are incorporated in:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html
previous version is at:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech-old.html
comments surrounded by brackets ([...]) below. let me know if you want
to discuss any of this.

Best,

~ Shawn


[DONE] alignment of suite contents menu (tf is indented on this page -
different  on difefrent pages of suite) Status (of doc) is difefrent
between different pages of  the suite

[changing this sentence throughout the suite] can be presented based on
how =  can be included depending on whether (??) and 
[DONE] effortby defining = and effort by defining (this is a common
problem on  this page - the lack of a space between words)

[hummm, this is technical factors page, not financial factors] Need to
emphasise  the potential financial benefits and <link>Cost
Savings</link> at the end of the  Introduction.

Reduce Site Development and Maintenance Time
Facilitate efficient debugging
[DONE] WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 11.1, 3.2  = WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 11.1, 3.2,
11.2  content [DONE] repacking time = content repackaging time (or would
re-use or  revelopment be better terms?)

Reduce Server Load
[OK, need "proof" for references] @@ is this accurate?? YES (according
to HS  and AA)
[? what is the increased infrastructure?] additional servers and
increasing the  download = additional servers and increased
infrstructure, and increase the  download 
[DONE (added to first point)]need new point to pick up Checkpoint 3.1
(text  instead of images of text)

Enable Content on Different Configurations
[DONE] Intro line needs better explanation of "different configurations"
- eg user  agents, devices, operating systems, 
[DONE, plus added others and filled in wording] Extra item = device
independence (Checkpoints 9.2, 9.3) for usability across different
configurations

Be Prepared for Advanced Web Technologies
[DONE] by using metadata, such as RDF = by using metadata and
representing it  using RDF 
[DONE] backwards-combatibility = backwards-compatibility

Details on relation between ...
[do you have any of these?] is this where we were going to put in some
third  party references supporting the material in this section??



> -----Original Message-----
> From: wai-eo-editors-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:wai-eo-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:58 AM
> To: Shawn Lawton Henry
> Cc: H.Snetselaar@bartimeus.nl; wai-eo-editors@w3.org
> Subject: tech factors - copyedits and refs
> 
> 
> 
> REF: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html
> 
> alignment of suite contents menu (tf is indented on this page 
> - different on difefrent pages of suite) Status (of doc) is 
> difefrent between different pages of the suite
> 
> can be presented based on how = can be included depending on 
> whether (??) and effortby defining = and effort by defining 
> (this is a common problem on this page - the lack of a space 
> between words)
> 
> Need to emphasise the potential financial benefits and 
> <link>Cost Savings</link> at the end of the Introduction.
> 
> Reduce Site Development and Maintenance Time
> Facilitate efficient debugging
> WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 11.1, 3.2  = WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 11.1, 
> 3.2, 11.2 content repacking time = content repackaging time 
> (or would re-use or revelopment be better terms?)
> 
> Reduce Server Load
> @@ is this accurate?? YES (according to HS and AA)
> additional servers and increasing the download = additional 
> servers and increased  infrstructure, and increase the 
> download need new point to pick up Checkpoint 3.1 (text 
> instead of images of text)
> 
> Enable Content on Different Configurations
> Intro line needs better explanation of "different 
> configurations" - eg user agents, devices, operating systems, 
> Extra item = device independence (Checkpoints 9.2, 9.3) for 
> usability across different configurations
> 
> Be Prepared for Advanced Web Technologies
> by using metadata, such as RDF = by using metadata and 
> representing it using RDF backwards-combatibility = 
> backwards-compatibility
> 
> Details on relation between ...
> is this where we were going to put in some third party 
> references supporting the material in this section??
> 
> Henk & Andrew
> _________________________________
> Dr Andrew Arch
> Manager Online Accessibility Consulting
> National Information & Library Service, Australia
> Ph 613 9864 9222; Fax 613 9864 9210; Mobile 0438 755 565 
> http://www.nils.org.au/ | > http://www.it-test.com.au/ | 
> http://www.ozewai.org/
> 
> Member, 
> Education & Outreach Working 
> Group,
> W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/
> 
> NILS - A Joint Venture between the
> Royal Victorian Institute for the Blind, The Royal Blind 
> Society of NSW, and Vision Australia Foundation.
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 21:01:48 UTC