> If we want canonicalization to be stable, it needs to be > bounded and clear. Yes! Initially I did not quite get it why this all is needed. I now can somehow understand the principle need for canonicalization, but still fear the rathole we could get in here if we go too far. I really would prefer if only encoding, spaces etc. would be canonicalized and everything beyond that need not to. That would make it bounded and clear. Peter
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 11:28:03 EDT