Re: sellability of D-link vs. LONGDESC

Al wrote:
>Whether it will be easier to persuade and train people to
>implement accessible websites with visible links to descriptions
>or the LONGDESC attribute -- that's an open question and a
>judgement call.

I believe that both the ALT= and LONGDESC= (or it's equivalent) need
NOT be "sold" to content authors, but sold to the HTML group as
"required".  If these attributes are missing, the HTML should be
considered incorrect and not to spec.

The IPO should help "train" the content authors to do a good job of
filling in the ALT= and LONGDECSC= with meaningful and appropriate
information; elaborate descriptions for elaborate images, and null
strings for null images (e.g., empty images used for positioning)


Phill Jenkins     (678-4517 tieline)  512 838-4517
IBM Special Needs  Fax:  512 838-9367
11501 Burnet Rd    pjenkins@us.ibm.com
Austin TX 78758    http:// www.ibm.com/sns

Received on Monday, 15 September 1997 11:08:52 UTC