W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-wg@w3.org > April to June 1997

Re: ALT content question

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 1997 15:54:29 +0200
Message-Id: <199706091354.PAA26220@www47.inria.fr>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
cc: w3c-wai-wg@w3.org

Al wrote:
 
> They are both inappropriate.  The ALT text should be
> 
> 	W3C Projects Status

and 

> The anchor content should advise you what is at the far end of the
> link.  


Shouldn't the TITLE attribute convey the information about the
destination of a link ?

I'd rather separate the meaning of the image from the meaning of its
application in a particular context using different attributes.

e.g
  <IMG SRC="w3clogo.png" ALT="W3C logo">
is one thing
and 
  <A HREF="http://www.w3.org" TITLE="W3C Projects Status">
     <IMG SRC="w3clogo.png" ALT="W3C logo">
  </A>

(TITLE is now a core attributes in Cougar but was in A since day one)
 
> If this image were not the content of a link, but used to frame
> the signature section of the page, the ALT text is better "W3C"
> and not "W3C logo" if the browser is Lynx.  In Netscape with the
> graphics turned off, I might prefer "W3C logo."  In speech, ...?

You realize of course that it's better not to depend on a particular
browser, but could explain why one is better in one context.
Received on Monday, 9 June 1997 09:56:42 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:59:54 EDT