W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2014

Minutes of UAWG teleconference of 13 March 2014

From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:35:04 -0400
Message-ID: <533D7FA8.90602@w3.org>
To: UAWG <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
These minutes were not sent originally. I am sending them late so that 
they will be included in the archives and be searchable.

http://www.w3.org/2014/03/13-ua-minutes.html


    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

     User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference

13 Mar 2014

    See also: [2]IRC log

       [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/13-ua-irc

Attendees

    Present
    Regrets
           Jim

    Chair
           SV_MEETING_CHAIR

    Scribe
           jeanne

Contents

      * [3]Topics
          1. [4]Next meeting
          2. [5]Math/science holidays
          3. [6]Comment Responses
          4. [7]review comments
          5. [8]OP06 - Jan's proposal
          6. [9]OP06 2.3.1 from Jan's Proposal
      * [10]Summary of Action Items
      __________________________________________________________

    <trackbot> Date: 13 March 2014

    <scribe> scribe: jeanne

Next meeting

    Jeanne & Jim will be at CSUN. Kim will be on vacation, so only
    Greg, Jan and Kelly are around.

    <kford> sorry for my delay.

    <Greg> Tomorrow is Pi Day, but don't forget
    [11]http://www.moleday.org/ in October.

      [11] http://www.moleday.org/

Math/science holidays

Comment Responses

    <kford> comments document:
    [12]http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2014/LCcomments.html

      [12] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2014/LCcomments.html

    Jeanne updated the editors draft and LC comment spreadsheet
    with the actions from last week's meeting.

    <kford> regrests: Jim

    No meeting next week - 20 March 2014

review comments

    [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2014JanMar/0
    046.html

      [13] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2014JanMar/0046.html

OP06 - Jan's proposal

    [14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2014JanMar/0
    046.html

      [14] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2014JanMar/0046.html

    <kford> JS reading JR's proposal

    GL: This lowers the bar to be non-existent - it uses "may".

    JS: Is this a problem? A video would not use those, they would
    use "scenes".
    ... We should add scenes to the list of examples.

    <Greg> My preference would be "*should* include *recognized*
    headings, table captions...", but I can live with the proposed
    wording.

    <scribe> ACTION: Jeanne to update 1.9.1 to say: 1.9.1 Outline
    View: Users can view a navigable outline of the rendered
    content that allows focus to be moved to the corresponding
    element in the main viewport. (Level AA) [recorded in
    [15]http://www.w3.org/2014/03/13-ua-minutes.html#action01]

    - Note: The elements reflected in the outline view will depend
    on the web content technology and can include: headings, table
    captions, content sections, and scenes.

    <trackbot> Created ACTION-960 - Update 1.9.1 to say: 1.9.1
    outline view: users can view a navigable outline of the
    rendered content that allows focus to be moved to the
    corresponding element in the main viewport. (level aa) [on
    Jeanne F Spellman - due 2014-03-20].

    Resolution: Accept Jan's proposal for 1.9.1 with minor edits

OP06 2.3.1 from Jan's Proposal

    JS: It's a big change from important elements to enabled
    elements. Since we are requiring direct navigation to each one,
    that's a LOT of keyboard shortcuts

    GL: That's the 'mouseless browsing" extension

    KP: but that works with links and not all enabled elements

    <Greg> We don't necessarily have a full implementation yet, one
    that goes to all enabled elements. Would not be that big a
    change for Mouseless Browsing to add that.

    <Greg> Kim says that it does support almost all enabled
    elements.

    KP: It should do anything you can click on.

    JS: I withdraw my objection.

    GL: So we have an implementation of this with enabled elements.

    KP: Mouseless browsing has been around for a long time with
    increasing coverage of "gaps". I haven't looked around in a
    long time.

    Jan's update: 2.3.1 Allow Direct Navigation to Enabled
    Elements: The user can move keyboard focus directly to any
    enabled elements in the rendered content. (Level AA)

    <Greg> Jeanne questioned move to "move keyboard focus to" on
    touchscreen devices, but we already require a virtual keyboard
    focus in those cases.

    GL: Link to the definition of keyboard focus which reminds them
    it is not just a physical keyboard.

    JS: There is a comment that says we are dated because we
    mention keyboard so much.

    KP: We have the note, modality independent controls.
    ... could we use that phrase?

    <Greg> UAAG20 makes it clear that keyboard isn't always
    physical keyboard, but that is spread out through several
    definitions and the Note at the beginning of Principle 2.

    JS: I think we should postpone this discussion until we address
    the comment about keyboard issue.

    <Greg> We could change term to something technology neutral,
    like "mechanism for discrete input", but Kim thinks Jan had
    argument against that.

Summary of Action Items

    [NEW] ACTION: Jeanne to update 1.9.1 to say: 1.9.1 Outline
    View: Users can view a navigable outline of the rendered
    content that allows focus to be moved to the corresponding
    element in the main viewport. (Level AA) [recorded in
    [16]http://www.w3.org/2014/03/13-ua-minutes.html#action01]
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2014 15:35:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:45 UTC