RE: Stem consistency proposals

Hi Kim,

I agree that the stems are inconsistent but I'm not sure about adding verbs (provide, allow, make, etc.) all over the place. And it seems like you're not sure either... e.g., you leave GL1.5 alone.

I wonder if a better style rule might be noun phrases unless there is unacceptable ambiguity. This is what ATAG 2.0 does and also seems to be what WCAG did (e.g. "Turn-off" and "Extend" under 2.2.1.).

-Jan

From: Kim Patch [mailto:kim@redstartsystems.com]
Sent: September-03-13 2:58 PM
To: User Agent Working Group
Subject: Stem consistency proposals

A spreadsheet is attached with proposed title changes to SC  titles to make them clear, consistent within each section, and to make sure every title is from the user agent point of view.

Cheers,
Kim
--
___________________________________________________

Kimberly Patch
President
Redstart Systems, Inc.
(617) 325-3966
kim@redstartsystems.com<mailto:kim@redstartsystems.com>

www.redstartsystems.com<http://www.redstartsystems.com>
- making speech fly

Blog: Patch on Speech
+Kim Patch
Twitter: RedstartSystems
www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch>
___________________________________________________

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 13:23:57 UTC