W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: UAWG minutes 6 Nov 2008

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:18:12 -0500
Message-ID: <A0F30F926F254ECC83B3492F9A0A7682@HANDS>
To: "Jim Allan" <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>

following up on my entries and their responses:

David Poehlman Comment: The proposal says interface but then goes on to say 
interface and rendered content. are we talking both? should they be split?

<AllanJ> Alan proposal: 2.1.2 For each user interface component, including 
the user interface itself and rendered content, make available its name, 
role, state, value, and description via an accessibility platform 
architecture.

JR: Looks good

<AllanJ> +1

Alan C: Should say 'and every' as opposed to each?

JR: Likes the way it is

<scribe> ACTION: jeanne Write back to David - re new wording [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/06-ua-minutes.html#action01]
I like every here too and we used to have something about a documented 
accessibility api and such.  I gather that we are talking about components 
of the user interface with content in them and not the user interface and 
the content it is rendering.  If the latter, it needs to be separate.

Judy: can we ask David Poehlman to clarify his comment 'cannot accept, 
advise or reject.'

<AllanJ> ACTION: jim to write david concerning clarify comment on 2.1.4 - 
need more expansion [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/06-ua-minutes.html#action07]
It just meant I had no comment but didn't want to leave it blank and to 
explain a bit of why.
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 21:25:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:52:05 GMT