W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2008

Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 LC - UA

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:30:08 -0500
Message-ID: <478F90A0.9040603@utoronto.ca>
To: WAI-UA list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>

Hi all,

After reviewing the WCAG 2.0 Last Call, I'm glad to say I don't have any
major concerns from a UAAG 2.0 perspective. I think the "accessibility 
supported" concept is a good one that puts a nice focus on the role of 
the user agent. (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#accessibility-supporteddef)

Here are some other thoughts:

Conformance: I think listing the user agent tested on should be required
for increased transparency.

1.1.1 - Media, Test, Sensory - Suggest breaking this complicated bullet
into it's 5 parts

1.4.1 - Not sure Note 1 is necessary...other forms of perception are
covered in several places including later in 1.4: "Note 1: This Success
Criterion addresses color perception specifically. Other forms of
perception are covered in Guideline 1.3."

2.3.1 - Ed: "Web pages do" link

2.2.5 - Exception needed for unsubmitted data? as in ATAG 2.0

3.3.4 - Maybe make more general by including examples as e.g.s - as it
stands sending emails unlikely to be included


-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information Studies
University of Toronto

   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
   Phone: 416-946-7060
   Fax:   416-971-2896
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:30:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:53 GMT