- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:24:20 +0200
- To: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
david poehlman wrote:
> I don't have your quote handy from the spec, but as I read it and as I
> understood it as we were developping it, title was considered to be
> addative.
This is the list of possibilities for handling of "summary, title,
alternative, description, or expansion of another piece of content D":
* (1a) render C in place of D;
* (2a) render C in addition to D;
* (3a) provide access to C by allowing the user to query D. In this
case, the user agent must also alert the user, on a
per-element basis, to the existence of C (so that the user
knows to query D); and
* (4a) allow the user to follow a link to C from the context of D.
According to the spec, it would be ok to only implement (1a).
> I wonder if it's part of the erratta?
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/UAAG-errata> reads:
Entries
No entries.
--
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2004 13:25:03 UTC