W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: OBEY UAAG: Maccessibility series on Safari and UAAG

From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:50:43 -0500
To: koteles@illinoisalumni.org, Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-id: <HDEAKIPKOHBCMDILOOPNIEFKGHAA.jimallan@tsbvi.edu>

I agree, linking to the series would be a good thing. The editorial comments
and explantory expansions go a long way to demistifying the guidelines; and
present them in a way that the non-techy, or even those techies who did not
participate in the development of the guidelines, can understand.

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Colin Koteles
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Kynn Bartlett; Ian B. Jacobs
Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Subject: Re: OBEY UAAG: Maccessibility series on Safari and UAAG




I think linking to this resource would be appropriate.  Propagating this
kind of awareness is very important for UAAG.

Beyond the evaluation, this also nicely distills some of the Recommendation’
s major points.


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Date:  29 May 2003 15:01:18 -0400

>
>On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 14:35, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
>> On Maccessibility.com, I've started an intermittent series on Safari's
>> status with regards to UAAG.
>
>
>Hi Kynn,
>
>This is too weird: I was reading it when suddenly this
>message appeared in my inbox. Were you watching me? <grin>
>
>This is a nifty annotated UAAG 1.0 evaluation of safari. I
>like your editorial comments like "Huh?" and "Whew!" <big grin>.
>
>Thanks for doing this. I'm thinking about linking to
>it from the UAWG home page. Do others have thoughts on
>that?
>
> _ Ian
>
>>  It's not a full analysis as per
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/10/eval -- since Safari is still in the
>> "public beta" stage -- but it hopefully will be read by the developers
>> at Apple and could have some effect on the discussion of what should go
>> in Safari next.
>>
>> Here's what's been published on Maccessibility so far:
>>
>> OBEY UAAG, Part 0:  Understanding UAAG
>>    http://www.maccessibility.com/archive/000595.php
>>
>> OBEY UAAG, Part 1:  Configuring Safari
>>    http://www.maccessibility.com/archive/000596.php
>>
>> --Kynn
>>
>> --
>> Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                     http://kynn.com
>> Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain                http://idyllmtn.com
>> Author, CSS in 24 Hours                       http://cssin24hours.com
>> Inland Anti-Empire Blog                      http://blog.kynn.com/iae
>> Shock & Awe Blog                           http://blog.kynn.com/shock
>--
>Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
>
>



---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.474 / Virus Database: 272 - Release Date: 4/18/2003

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.474 / Virus Database: 272 - Release Date: 4/18/2003
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 09:53:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:14 GMT