W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: UAAG review comments (personal)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:25:00 -0400
Message-ID: <3D986CCC.3000700@w3.org>
To: ishida@w3.org
CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org

Richard Ishida wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> I have forwarded your responses to the i18n group comments to the i18n group for review. Thankyou.
> 
> I wanted to come back on the following:
> 
> 
>> > #ri-1:
>> > Sec 2, 1st bulleted list
>> > It would be useful to clarify the intent and normative status of 
>>the bold text that immediately follows a guideline title.
>>
>>See the beginning of section 2, which gives a succinct 
>>explanation of the normative and informative parts of each 
>>checkpoint definition.
>>
>>"Each checkpoint definition includes the following parts. Some parts 
>>are normative (i.e., relate to conformance); others are informative 
>>only. ..."
> 
> 
> I was actually referring to the text related to guidelines, not checkpoints.  
 >The first bulleted list in ch2 mentions the guideline number and 
guideline title
 >(which I assume are both inside the box), but then goes on to the 
rationale without
 >mentioning the intervening bold text (eg. From Guideline 1: 
"Ensure that the user
 >can interact with the user agent (and the content it renders) 
through different
 > input and output devices.")  It is this bold text I am querying.

Ok, thanks for the clarification. Yes, I can indicate that that's 
informative as well.

Thanks Richard,

  _ Ian



-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 11:25:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:11 GMT