W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 2002

UAAG review comments (personal)

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:25:22 +0100
To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Cc: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901c263e6$fbd2cf80$0d02000a@w3c40upc3ma3j2>

Please find enclosed some personal last call comments on the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
Version reviewed was 21 August 2002
I18n WG comments will follow.

Sec 2, 1st bulleted list
It would be useful to clarify the intent and normative status of the bold text that immediately follows a guideline title.

Checkpoint 1.1, checkpoint provisions for this and all following checkpoints Consider naming the checkpoint provisions 1.1.1 or 1.1.a and so on, so they can be easily referred to directly.

Checkpoint 1.1, last para 
Shouldn't this para have some more formal status (perhaps within normative inclusions and exclusions)?

Checkpoint 2.2, Sufficient technique 1
Suggest: 'text format, not just implemented" -> "text format, in addition to implemented" 

By the way, note that the numbering in the document is a little confusing.  Eg. there appear at first glance to be two sections labelled 1.1.

Hope that helps,

Richard Ishida

The W3C Internationalization Activity has restructured, and has issued a call for participation.  
See http://www.w3.org/International/about.html

tel: +44 1753 480 292
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 12:28:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:32 UTC