W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: Proposed requirements for checkpoint 6.4 (Response Required)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:02:19 -0400
Message-ID: <3D48424B.6010500@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
CC: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>, Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> Works  for me.
> 
> Does this have to be the rendered form, the author-specified form, or are
> either OK? (For example, an author may have specified two different fonts,
> and the User Agent may render the first one, or the second if it lacks the
> first, or neither, if it doesn't have them. Alternatively they may have been
> overridden by an author style sheet, or a high-contrast setting might be
> causing rendering in black and white when the autor has specified several
> colours).

The goal of this checkpoint is to make available what's *actually*
rendered.

This would be a good clarification.

  - Ian


> 
> Charles
> 
> 
>>Please RESPOND as soon as possible to this e-mail on whether you agree or
>>disagree with the changes.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 16:05:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:11 GMT