W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: [Proposal] Delete VisualText and ColorText conformance labels

From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 09:16:51 -0500
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-id: <HDEAKIPKOHBCMDILOOPNKEGFEFAA.jimallan@tsbvi.edu>

+1


Jim Allan, Webmaster & Statewide Technical Support Specialist
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9264  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"I see the Earth. It is so beautiful."--first words spoken by human in
space.
[Yuri Alekseevich Gagarin, from the Vostok 1, April 12, 1961.]


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Ian B. Jacobs
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 8:15 AM
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Subject: [Proposal] Delete VisualText and ColorText conformance labels



Dear UAWG,

While revising UAAG 1.0, I started to think about two
of the content type labels [1] in the document:

   VisualText: checkpoints 3.3 (blinking), 4.1 (text size), 4.2 (font
               family)
   ColorText: checkpoint 4.3 (text colors - note; the spec
              incorrectly refers to 10.4).

In the current document, a graphical user agent that renders
text can conform to UAAG 1.0 without stopping blinking or allowing
the user to change text size, font family, or text foreground and
background colors.

I think that all conforming user agents should provide these
functionalities. Remember, the applicability provision means that
some user agents are exempt (namely, those that don't have
graphical renderings, those rendering formats where this type
of control is impossible, etc.)

PROPOSAL:

  - Raise the bar for conformance by eliminating the VisualText
    and ColorText content type labels. The four checkpoints in
    question would no longer be optional for conformance.

These already widely deployed functionalities will
benefit some users with low vision, color deficiencies,
and some cognitive disabilities or reading disorders.

Jon has already expressed his support for this proposal
(and adds that it will simplify conformance).

Please indicate your support for this proposal as follows:

1) If you support it, respond to this email with a "+1".
2) If you don't, respond with a "-1".

In either case, you may include additional comments.

As soon as there is at least +3 support and no negative
responses, I will make the change to the next draft (which
the UAWG will get to review). If there are any negative
responses, I request that this proposal be on the agenda
of the next meeting.

Thank you,

  _ Ian

P.S. I am making progress revising the document!


[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-UAAG10-20010912/conformance#content-type-labels
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/2002
Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 10:17:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:08 GMT