W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2002

AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 May 2002

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 17:11:57 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
WAI UA Telecon for May 9th, 2002

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 9 May 2002
Time: 2:00-3:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT)
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038


1. Review Action Items

2. Discussion

Issue 544: Should we delete requirements re: fee links from UAAG 1.0 since 
not really part of Web today?

Issue 543: [Clarification] 11.5: Forward/back one viewport for 2d 
renderings only?

Issue 542: [Clarification] 11.5: What does "refresh" mean, notably in light 
of usage in 3.5

Issue 541: [Clarification] 11.5 (default binding requirements): Moving UI 
focus to address box sufficient

Issue 540: [Editorial] 10.3 (indicate rendering progress): Clarify that not 
about download progress, but position of viewport

Issue 539: 11.6 (user profiles): Must the user profile be portable? Does 
saving configurations suffice?

Issue 538: [Editorial] Make checkpoint requirements distinct from 
exceptions, sufficient conditions

Issue 536: [Editorial] 9.7: Title is too forceful and doesn't communicate 
key bit of checkpoint

Issue 535: 9.4 (restore history): Must consider UA cache availability Issue

Issue 534: [Clarification] 9.3 (Move content focus): Clarify that "each 
element" refers to elements in set defined in provision 1

Open Action Items

IJ: Update issues list.

IJ: Add a note to 12.2 (documentation) to remind people that APIs benefit 

IJ: Update techniques document with RS text:

IJ: Send proposal for Guideline 10 modifications based on today's 
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html

IJ: Propose text to the UAWG on conformance profiles for use by other 
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html

IJ: Review UAAG 1.0 for which checkpoints should be "all formats" v. 
"formats that are part of the claim".

JG: Write up user scenarios for why non-text-based highlighting important 
for users; notably which users.
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
See for additional questions: 

JG: Clarify why "Max rating" used in some cases (in low implementation 
experience section) and "Avg rating" in some cases. Also, delete "+/-" with 
P (round down from G to P)

JG: Contact developers for requirements

RS: Write up paragraph about the importance of thread-safe access for 
in-process ATs.

ALL: Send to the WG the top 5 things you need through an API.
Deadline: 4 April 2002

HB: Find out what SVG WG is doing these days in the way of test suites, and 
find out how to get UAAG 1.0 requirements incorporated.

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 18:07:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:31 UTC