W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Checkpoint labels: "For content" and "For rendered content"

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:43:07 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010705094147.0131ba80@staff.uiuc.edu>
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Ian,
If we have been getting questions, then it is probably good to include the 
references.  I prefer the "For all content", since it seems to contrast 
more clearly to "For rendered content".

Jon


At 01:02 PM 6/22/2001 -0400, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
>Hello,
>
>The UAAG 1.0 (e.g., the 4 June 2001 draft [1]) includes labels to
>indicate whether a checkpoint must be satisfied for content, for
>user agent features, or for both.
>
>I am pondering whether we need to be more specific for content
>labels:
>
>  - Some requirements are for rendered content only (where rendered
>    content is a subset of all content). For instance, our search
>    requirement is limited to what is rendered.
>
>  - Other requirements refer to all content (e.g., conform to
>    specifications).
>
>I think we might want to "split" the content label into
>"For rendered content" and "For all content" (or just "For content").
>
>I examined the checkpoints labeled "For content" in the 4 June
>draft and I would categorize them as follows:
>
>
>For content: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3,
>3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 4.17, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.7. 6,8, 6.9, 8.1,
>8.2, 9.10, 11.2
>
>For rendered content: 1.2 (assumes that the content focus is only on
>rendered content), 2.4, 2.6, 2.10, 2.11, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5,
>4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 5.5,
>5.6, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4,
>10.5, 10.6, 10.8
>
>This split may not be necessary because in most cases it's obvious
>which class is intended. However, we have received questions about
>the search requirement and others that suggest that people are
>thinking about this. I think this clarification would be useful.
>
>Your comments welcome. I do not intend to include this in the
>next draft.
>
>  - Ian
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20010604/
>
>--
>Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>Tel:                     +1 831 457-2842
>Cell:                    +1 917 450-8783

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
MC-574
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 10:41:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:57 GMT