aloha, ian! one of the problems with the new "distributed" UAAG 1.0 is that it is impossible to ascertain the date of the document one is reading from within a sub-section, unless that sub-section happens to be cover.html this is a really annoying aspect of the chopping up of technical recommendations into bite-sized morsels... why isn't there a W3C Process guarding against this? if date-stamps are important enough to embed in URIs, surely they should be repeated somewhere in a document which "may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time" gregory. On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > David Poehlman wrote: > > > > what does next mean at the top of the page? > > In the new "distributed" UAAG 1.0, the first link > on each page is "next", which takes you to the next > chapter. It is followed by "contents", which takes > you to the main table of contents. > > _ Ian ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSURDITY, n. A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devils' Dictionary_ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Thursday, 14 June 2001 10:35:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:50 GMT