Re: Minimum requirements for checkpoint 7.3

Why not provide a checkpoint at P2 that provides for more powerful methods of
navigation (my candidates would be backward sequential, page up, and page
down, with Lynx as the implementation example).

Cheers

Charles McCN

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Jon Gunderson wrote:

  Greg,
  In your comments [1] to the W3C user agent working group you suggested that
  checkpoint 7.3 should have stronger minimum requirements.  The working
  group also feels the same way and has struggled with this issue for a long
  time, but has not been able to come up with a better minimum requirement
  that we can reach consensus on. This issue is currently logged as issue 414
  [2].

  The working group would like to consider any proposal you would like to
  make for changing the minimum requirement, otherwise the issue will be
  considered resolved with no change.

  Look forward to hearing from you and thanks again for your comments,

  Jon


  [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2000OctDec/0310.html
  [2] http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#414
  Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
  Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
  Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
  MC-574
  College of Applied Life Studies
  University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
  1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

  Voice: (217) 244-5870
  Fax: (217) 333-0248

  E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

  WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
  WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
until 6 January 2001 at:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Tuesday, 26 December 2000 10:39:30 UTC