- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:46:29 -0500
- To: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Liam Quinn wrote: > > Hi, > > Congratulations to all for their hard work on UAAG 1.0. I reviewed the > Last Call draft [1] and found only a couple minor issues: > > For Guideline 1, it would be helpful to briefly explain (in parentheses > or the glossary) the meaning of the phrase "pre-rasterize text". Ok. > Checkpoint 3.4 discusses "blinking images", but it could use "animated > or blinking images" to be more encompassing. That's covered in checkpoint 3.2 (audio, video, animated images). This is because "audio, video, animations" often appears as a trio in this document, so blinking images gets its own checkpoint. > Also, the techniques for this > checkpoint mention "animated or blinking text" when I think they should > say > "animated or blinking images". It may be useful to suggest in the > techniques > that the still image rendered be the first frame of an animated image. Yep, that's an editorial bug in the Techniques document. Thank you Liam, - Ian > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023/ -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2000 14:46:46 UTC