W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 2000

[last call, S1] Checkpoint 1.1 is unclear

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:26:24 -0500
Message-Id: <Version.32.20001112210919.0422ebf0@pop.iamdigex.net>
Message-Id: <Version.32.20001112210919.0422ebf0@pop.iamdigex.net>
Message-Id: <Version.32.20001112210919.0422ebf0@pop.iamdigex.net>
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
What does checkpoint 1.1 actually require?

It is not clear that this states a concrete and observable requirement.  "All
user interface functionality but not input" sounds contradictory.

Checkpoint 9.4 is of some help in reducing the confusion.


Al
--
Usage in headers.  Comments in response to the last call request for comments
have been classified S1, S2, or E based on the following rough scale:

S1: Substantive matter of the first (highest) criticality or importance to the
mission of the document.  The standard set is ineffective, the document is
self
contradictory, etc.

S2: Substantive matter of a somewhat lower criticality.  The document is hard
to comprehend, does not align well with related WAI documents, etc.

E: Editorial matters.  Not regarded as substantive.

Re: 

User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0

W3C Working Draft 23 October 2000

   This version:
         
[9]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/W
D-UAAG10-20001023
Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 00:55:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:22 GMT