W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Accessibility of Documentation, checkpoint 11.1

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:35:26 -0400
Message-ID: <399D9E0E.21B39E20@w3.org>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
CC: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, barnicle@trace.wisc.edu, "'w3c-wai-ua@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Al Gilman wrote:
> 
> At 01:30 PM 2000-08-18 -0500, Jon Gunderson wrote:
> >I could live with that,.  What do other people think?
> >
> AG::
> 
> There appears to be an editorial error in the email bearing the proposal,
> that should be corrected to be crystal clear.
> 
> >>
> >>How about the following relative expression of the checkpoint:
> >>
> >>   Provide a version of the product documentation that
> >>   conforms to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
> >>   1.0 [WCAG10]. [Priority 1 for Level A conformance, Priority 2
> >>   for Level Double-A conformance, Priority 3 for Level Triple-A
> >>   conformance.]
> >>
> >>1) This isn't too long or complicated.
> >>2) The implication is that if you want to be a level Double-A
> >>    conforming UA, your documentation has to conform to WCAG 1.0
> >>    level A. If you want to be a Triple-AAA UA, your documentation
> 
> AG:: where this line says level A, it should say level Double-A, as I read
> the definitive statement above.

Yes, my apologies for the error.

 _ Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Friday, 18 August 2000 16:35:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:14 GMT