- From: Poehlman, David <David.Poehlman@usmint.treas.gov>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:32:55 -0400
- To: "'Jon Gunderson'" <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
I've a bit of a problem with this because if the link alternative is chosen it might mean that the fascility is broken. As I understand it, the primary expectancy is for choice so we could narrow the number of items to two if we keep the link option by listing the configurations as one other alternative rather than three? I've a bit of a problem with this because if the link alternative is chosen it might mean that the fascility is broken. As I understand it, the primary expectancy is for choice so we could narrow the number of items to two if we keep the link option by listing the configurations as one other alternative rather than three? I've a bit of a problem with this because if the link alternative is chosen it might mean that the fascility is broken. As I understand it, the primary expectancy is for choice so we could narrow the number of items to two if we keep the link option by listing the configurations as one other alternative rather than three? I've a bit of a problem with this because if the link alternative is chosen it might mean that the fascility is broken. As I understand it, the primary expectancy is for choice so we could narrow the number of items to two if we keep the link option by listing the configurations as one other alternative rather than three? Ian, I am OK with this, how about anybody else? Jon > <NEW_UI> > 2.3 If content available in a viewport has equivalent alternatives, > provide easy access to the alternative equivalents > through at least one of the following mechanisms: > - Allowing configuration to render alternative > instead of primary content. > - Allowing configuration to render alternative in addition to > primary content. > - Providing a direct link to the alternative in content, > just before or after the primary content. > - Allowing the user to select the primary content and then > inspect its alternatives. > <NEW_UI> > >Notes: > >1) I put back the word "easy" since that helps understand the > rationale. > >2) I hesitate to put four techniques in a checkpoint, but if >implementing any one of them would mean that the UA met the >requirement, then I'm ok with that level of specificity. > > - Ian > >-- >Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >Tel: +1 831 457-2842 >Cell: +1 917 450-8783 Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2000 09:30:05 UTC