W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: UA Guidelines conflict: All content versus Limited Viewports (checkpoint 4.16)

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:15:00 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000710120602.012fafb0@staff.uiuc.edu>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org

>Jon Gunderson wrote:
> >
> > Ian,
> > Another approach to resolve this issue is that while only one view port may
> > be available at a time, the user agent should keep a list of viewports
> > available and allow the user to switch between the view ports.
>
>Can you explain how this works?

1. In the example of FRAMES only one of the frames would be available, but 
a list of frames that are part of the current document would be maintained 
by the user agent.  The user could access and display the frame they want 
visible.

2. In the case of something like a source view the user could switch the 
source view and the rendered view.

>What does it mean for a viewport
>to be available but not open?

Maybe is the issue is more making some viewports visible and some not 
visible.  The siwtching is making a viewport visible or not visible.

>Does that mean open but iconified?

In a graphical interface the views could be listed in a menu called "views" 
or "windows" for example or in a pop list that includes the view 
titles.  The visible view could be selected by the user.

Jon

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
MC-574
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Monday, 10 July 2000 14:14:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:13 GMT